| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 25 post(s) |
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
   |
Posted - 2006.10.02 04:03:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Nez Perces on 02/10/2006 04:04:21
The 'contested' subject is one that I hold very close to heart... and I have to agree that Joshua (for possibly the first time in his time distinguished mapmaking career) has jumped the gun on designating paragon soul as contested.
At the time of this post, all soverignty is still in ASCN hands and there is no report from BoB of any POS takedowns having ocurred.
This may well change in under a weeks time, but at the moment a war marker is more than sufficient.
Pre-emptive designation of regions as contested is a dangerous path to embark upon. It can negatively affect ASCN morale and skew the general perception of the real progress of the campaign.
As it stands the depiction of Paragon Soul as contested is erroneous.
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.10.02 18:21:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Nez Perces on 02/10/2006 18:22:15
 Originally by: fugazii
you have posted 5 times in this thread, maybe you should reread what you posted? 
Actually DBpreacher has a point, there have been up to 6 different ASCN posters posting about a map change in this thread.
The rules for the thread are quite clear :
Originally by: Abdalion
Please pick ONE person per alliance/faction to post about your claims from either side, and stick to that.
Having said that, neither I nor you should be posting on this subject either as we are not in the alliances involved in the conflict.
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 04:58:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Nez Perces on 11/10/2006 04:58:18
Originally by: SamuraiJack
The Siege of TPAR-G
As per Molle himself. Region is contested. Peroid Basis.
well thats strange, just looked at the in-game map and don't see any ASCN sovereignty in the regions you just mentioned.
Could you be lying?
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.10.25 21:39:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Nez Perces on 25/10/2006 21:40:24
Originally by: Dianabolic
The claim is rubbish, come back to us when you a) decide you can tie your horse to the space claiming fraternity and b) have sovereignty and have a station (not just one or the other).
I'm not involved in this conflict, and I have no right to post here... but ... something needs to be said about this situation.
Diana, you better than most must feel the deja-vu in this topic.
Contested status + Fountain space. The last time there was a dispute about this item..... well you remember.
In those days there were no outposts... so it was near impossible to decide wether an npc region was contested or not.
However, now there are outposts and it would seem that the outpost ASCN have conquered is the only possible way for contested status to be categorically conferred to an npc region.
This issue is going to raise a conundrum for Joshua.. and it will be an item, which if mishandled could cause irreparable damage to his impecable reputuation thus far.
Joshua is categorically the best mapmaker EVE has had imo... this is a pretty grey area and I hope that in the interests of the community, BOTH sides help him to reach a solution you will BOTH be happy with.
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.10.25 22:08:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Dianabolic
Indeed. As my previous post(s) in this thread aludes to:
Claim sovereignty (not done).
Take a station (done).
Tick both boxes and we'll grant and agree to the contested nature of Fountain. I believe such rules were agreed a while ago, I actually thought they were posted in this thread - obviously not. :(
Indeed they were.... the rules that is..... well if one looks at the ingame map, it is clear that not all of Fountain has npc sovereignty.. infact there are several systems showing BoB and Xelas sovereignty in the Fountain region.
ASCN has captured the outpost in PNQ, however their sovereignty on the system is not yet showing...
It is therefore only fair that both Outpost ownership and Sovereignty be required for contested status to occurr.
Ofc.. there is then the other issue of that being only one system of several containing either Xelas or BoB sovereignty... how many of these need to be knocked out before Josha conferrs contested status, will be another issue.
The point I was trying to make is that wether the station belonged to Xelas or BoB shouln't be a factor, when Joshua comes to decide on wether contestation is to be awarded or not.
It will be a conquered station within Fountain space.. a clearer "capture the flag" mechanism you won't get.
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.12.12 04:39:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Nifel
Maybe we shouldn't have warzones and territorial contests either? You know, people live there, and they might get insulted the map shows the rest of the EVE world how much they're getting their arses handed to them!
for real mate... this game should also be re-named Bear-online, so nobody gets the wrong idea before they start playing.
There is no pew pew in EVE, the new expansion wasn't code-named Kali after the Hindu goddess of war, it was really code-named Kernite 
|
| |
|